Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Help Save the Trees at Melilli Plaza Parking Lot!



The costly $1.2 million plan to improve Melilli Plaza parking lot behind Main Street Market will result in the loss of many large shade trees. Not only that, but dirty storm water will also be piped directly into the Connecticut River without treatment.

Last week a group representing diverse business and environmental interests met to discuss the plan, and how it could be modified to provide needed parking at a reduced cost, increase public safety, help beautify the area, and lessen potential environmental damage. Those attending the meeting included John Hall, Executive Director of The Jonah Center; Jane Harris, Vice President of The Rockfall Foundation and member of the Urban Forestry Commission; Jane Brawerman, Executive Director of the Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District and Vice-Chair of the Middletown Conservation Commission; and Wendy Goodfriend, Natural Resource Specialist of the Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District.

Concerns that were discussed include:
 Currently, the trees dispersed throughout the lot add beauty and provide needed cooling shade, but contrary to the Urban Forestry Commission’s recommendation, the new plan includes trees only around the edge
 The Conservation Commission and Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District recommended that low impact design elements and “green” practices be incorporated to reduce the impacts of polluted runoff, but none have been included.
 Without adequate walkways, the plan is unfriendly and unsafe for pedestrians.
 With no interior trees to moderate the heat island effect and no storm water treatment, the design of the lot sets a bad precedent for private developers from an environmental perspective.
 While municipal planning documents underscore the importance of the Connecticut River and recommend improving access to the waterfront, the plan does not protect the river or enhance the visibility, access, or visual appeal of the adjacent tunnel between Melilli Plaza and Harbor Park.

We have a brief window of opportunity to improve the parking lot plan due to some uncertainty and delay over funding. This project should not move forward without further public input. Recommendations of the boards and commissions appointed to advise the City should be incorporated. No one is opposing the project outright; all agree that the Melilli parking lot is in need of repair. But we can do better.

To make your voice heard, attend the Public Works Commission meeting on Wed. Dec. 9, at 5:30 p.m. in the Dept. of Public Works office. Council members on the Commission are James Streeto, Ron Klattenberg, and David Bauer. They can be emailed (and all Council members copied in) at Council@cityofMiddletown.com Mayor Giuliano can be emailed at Mayor@cityofmiddletown.com

15 comments:

ARTFARM said...

Yes. Speak up to save our trees. Be a local Lorax! Every tree downtown makes a difference, and this parking lot will indeed be a concrete wasteland without the current minimal tree cover. While we are at it, we should be planting the downtown with fruit and nut trees to provide the public with an edible and beautiful future.

Ridge Road Resident said...

Funny--whenever I am in this parking lot, I admire and commment on the beautiful trees. We need more trees in Middletown, not less - especially in this patch of asphalt. There was a great article in the NRDC magazine this month on Redrawing the American City that we can take some lessons from http://www.onearth.org/article/redrawing-the-american-city and an accompanying piece - Why Cities Need Trees http://www.onearth.org/article/why-cities-need-trees . Trees do more good then we realize! Save the trees!!!

Lady Cyclist (Beth Emery) said...

John, Thanks for letting us know about this. I cannot attend the meeting, but will send a letter. In part the letter will ask; is Middletown committed to being an environmental steward of her land in all circumstances or just when it is convenient? It is disingenuous for the city to claim to be an environmentally aware and friendly town, (which I have heard stated at many a Common Council and P&Z meeting) and then not follow through in projects such as this. I hope members of the Common Council will stay true to what I have heard them state they value, and review the concerns and recommendations that are being made on the Melilli project, and recommend change to remedy the problems. In the meantime I urge City Government to consider a resolution that states clearly the city’s commitment to the environment, and include within bullet points that follow sound environmental, and bike and pedestrian appropriate protocols. These concerns should never be after thoughts. The city needs a check-list, used for every project involving city funds and proprieties that is submitted to designers and architects before a contract is even signed.

I also came across these two web sites under CT Smart Growth, thanks to Ed's Middlelink which I browsed this morning.
Impervious Surfaces website http://nemo.uconn.edu/tools/impervious_surfaces/index.htm
and UConn's CLEAR Research Web site.
http://clear.uconn.edu/projects/landscape/your/town.asp?townname=83&Go=Go
both quiet interesting and pertinent.

E McAlister said...

Protecting our environment is our first priority in the face of the challenges of climate change. Period. Preserve the trees. No unclean water in the river.

Anne-Marie Cannata said...

Thanks John,
When I first saw this plan I got an uncomfortable feeling - and now I know why - loosing healthy trees is just not acceptable to me. We need to be planting more trees and saving the ones we have. There were some good ideas and links provided above. I encourage others to attend the meeting at 5:30 on Wednesday at City Hall to speak up for a new plan.

Anonymous said...

I think downtown has enough fruits and nuts.

FotoOlivia said...

A tree is what, a foot-thick? If you have to pour new asphalt, work around it! I realize the existing trees are not the well-manicured type of trees you see in many modern-built parking lots, but the point is, they offer SHADE.

They're healthy, they're beautiful, they do no harm. Who hasn't gone to a parking lot seeking out that perfect shady spot under a tree? People want to park under them. Leave them be!

Anonymous said...

We were not created to be the servants of automobiles. The Garden of Eden was car free. Here are a couple of links to illustrate these views.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8W9sdb4MH_M&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9-2oeFBy88&feature=channel

Unknown said...

Remember that Middletown used to be known as the Forest City? We definitely need more trees, not fewer! Parking is necessary too, but surely parking spaces and trees can co-exist.

stephan allison said...

Let's not forget that the trees mentioned are all buttonwood trees. When Susan Allison created The Buttonwood Tree on Rapallo Ave. in the north end, she arrived at the name partly because Rapallo Ave. used to appear on 17th or 18th century maps as "a lane of buttonwood trees". Will we need to create another community-based arts center as a metaphor to recall the wonder of trees in downtown Middletown? I hope not, it should be much easier to protect the trees we have. Just ask Anne-Marie Cannata how much effort it takes to run one Tree. Let's, as a community, get behind any efforts to save the trees.

Anonymous said...

The Garden of Eden was also clothing free.

Anonymous said...

I can get behind that.

Anonymous said...

I copied and pasted those YouTube videos from Anonymous 3:30, Dec 3. They were both very funny. The second one, "Chevron Song", might be a little racy for some Eye readers.

Looking at the drawing, what do those circles represent? New trees? Bushes? I agree with Ridge Road Resident that this particular "patch of asphalt" is particularly tree worthy.

Currently, the existing sidewalk peters out as City Hall is approached. That's a bit of a problem when crowds of lawyers make their way to the court house.

Is the bike rack well placed?

Runoff is an insidious source of pollution. It needs to be mitigated/reduced as much as possible with environment-friendly materials and techniques. Where does the runoff go now? Let's be a leader!

Having the new lot design incorporate an optional clothing feature, is an idea ahead of our times...

Anonymous said...

I find it interesting that we care about one dozen new growth trees when time after time developers submit their plans to P&Z and many times those acres of older growth woodlands are CLEAR CUT, THE WOOD AND THE STONE WALLS SOLD OFF within hours of the application being approved. SO AS A CARING COMMUNITY, WHERE ARE WE WHEN THAT HAPPENS??? WHERE IS OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS WHEN THOSE GREEDY DEVELOPERS STAND BEFORE THEM BEGGING FOR P&Z APPROVAL OF THEIR APPLICATIONS? Let's stick up for our values not just here but also there, and expect our elected officials to do the same. Including Phil Armetta who fills wetlands on weekends and he knew exactly what he was doing.

Anonymous said...

I hope they have a DEP permit to discharge stormwater to the CT River, those opposed just call DEP Inland Wetland Division and complain belive me the plan will change, you can go to the State web site go to the DEP and under directory contact Doug Hoskins, Denise Ruzkica, or Chris StoneI beleive the DEP may have something to say.